Workload allocation is a key element of academic staff terms and conditions. Allocation of workload must be reasonable, equitable and transparent. It should take account of class sizes and acknowledge the real time that different duties and responsibilities involve, with comparability between schools and within schools. The means for allocating academic workload is a contractual issue that must be negotiated and agreed with UCU as the recognised trade union for academic staff at UEL. The agreed UEL Academic Workload Allocation Model (AWAM) allocates hours within an annual total of 1548 hours to different duties and responsibilities academics fulfil thereby ensuring a reasonable distribution among academic staff.
AWAM:
- accounts for the full range of work that academics undertake: teaching, research, tutorials, administration, programme leadership, school-wide roles, open days/admissions, outreach and committees
- accounts for module size – larger modules with greater assessment loads are allocated more hours than smaller modules
- accounts for the additional preparation necessary both for developing new modules and teaching a new module for the first time
- is flexible – if responsibilities change, this is reflected in a revised timetable
- clearly identifies allocation of the 1548 working hours per year
AWAM is open, fair, transparent and was negotiated by UCU in the interests of both academic staff and management.
In the last year management have sought to replace AWAM by imposing a new ‘Academic Portfolio Reference Model’ (APRM) which is, in comparison, overly mechanistic and inequitable. UEL management have acknowledged that APRM is not an algorithm for allocation of workload and stated that it is not intended that a member of academic staff be designated a band and their workload allocated accordingly. Yet this is exactly what has happened with academic workloads increased as a result, often at short notice. APRM has not been agreed and, as a consequence, there is now no uniform practice of work-load management across the university.
What UEL needs is an agreed, workable, workload allocation mechanism for academic staff; the APRM does not deliver this; it is not fit for purpose and has been imposed without agreement.
UCU is seeking a fair and transparent workload allocation model.
UEL management need to negotiate and agree a new model that will provide reasonable and equitable academic workloads across the University, to the benefit of staff and students alike. Despite committing to negotiate with UCU about workloads, senior management have failed to enter into meaningful discussion of a new academic workload model and have instead persisted with the attempted imposition of the fundamentally flawed APRM.
UCU’s priority is to defend your interests. We want to see a fair, transparent, flexible and equitable workload allocation process; we are willing to discuss an improved alternative to the agreed AWAM but any changes must be negotiated and agreed with your union.
Despite management protestations to the contrary, it is now absolutely clear that the only way to ensure a negotiated and agreed system for fair workload allocation at UEL is through a strong YES vote for industrial action in the current ballot. A clear YES vote will strengthen UCU’s negotiating position.
VOTE YES to reject the imposition of the divisive APRM
VOTE YES to tell management that their unwillingness to consult and negotiate with UCU cannot continue, and that we demand a fair workload allocation model
VOTE YES TO STRIKE ACTION and
VOTE YES TO ACTION SHORT OF STRIKE
For and on behalf of UCU @ UEL Branch Committee
University and College Union UCU